OUAAZ V. 20TH CENTURY STUDIOS, INC., ET AL.

What happens when you attempt to serve 27 high-powered, influential, and difficult to access parties for SIX MONTHS straight, invoking procedural codes and being denied procedural remedies, while devoting a nearly full time bandwidth protecting your rights? 

You go broke. That's what happened to me in real time. Nationwide, the established precedent is to liberally construe all pro se pleadings and to hold us to less stringent standards as attorneys. Access to courts is a constitutional right, whether rich or poor.

DISCLAIMER

All statements on this website are written by Kade Wise and are derived from publicly filed court records and other publicly available information. This website is intended for informational purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes legal advice, and nothing should be interpreted as a determination of the merits of any pending legal matter. All claims referenced remain subject to judicial determination. This publication is made pursuant to rights protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and applicable law.

VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS

Pursuing complex litigation while maintaining financial stability presents real challenges, particularly for an individual without institutional backing. Contributions help offset basic living expenses and litigation-related administrative costs so that I may continue navigating this legal process responsibly and lawfully.

Any support is voluntary and appreciated. Contributions are not investments and do not influence the legal process. All proceedings remain subject to judicial determination. 

Thank you for supporting access to due process and equal justice.

Anonymous Contributions Welcome on VENMO | CASHAPP | ZELLE